It was near midnight. Gnarly oak trees and sandy pines draped with
Spanish moss encroached upon the narrow road. Warm air sweetened by the
scent of orange blossoms wafted through the windows as the van lurched
to a stop. The headlights illuminated a metal sign pinned to a gate
that read “Archbold Research Station.” We had arrived.
Most of us had fallen asleep during the two-hour drive down from
Orlando, and when we woke, gone was the Florida of brilliantly
illuminated palms, sleek buildings, smooth tram rides, shops filled
with colorful souvenirs, and swarms of children with Mickey Mouse caps.
Ahead of us were encounters with tortoises, armadillos, alligators, and
wild boars, and explorations of mucky swamps and desertlike scrublands.
Through this gate we were to discover an entirely different wilderness
— and an entirely new way to consider the land.
For one week during spring break, a band of eight Harvard students in
the “Ecology and Land-Use Planning” seminar descended upon the quiet,
rural Florida town of Lake Placid. While there, we rapidly assimilated
all that we could about the area’s ecosystem, and then, with newfound
appreciation for the natural ecology, we began to consider how to
redesign the community in an environmentally minded manner. Harvard
Graduate School of Design Professor Richard T. Forman, often touted as
the father of landscape ecology, has led this seminar and trip to
central Florida for 14 years now. The seminar, offered through the
Environmental Science and Public Policy (ESPP) Department, is designed
to allow students to actually experience how human necessities such as
housing, commercial areas, agriculture, industry, water supply, and
natural resources affect the natural ecosystem. We are then challenged
to design our own creative land-use solutions that integrate ecological
sensitivity with human necessities, and we produce real plans for the
future of Lake Placid that aim to minimize impacts on the environment.
The inland town of Lake Placid was chosen for the course’s first field
study because of its unique ecological situation: It lies on the Lake
Wales Ridge. Around 3 million years ago, when the sea level was much
higher, this ridge down the center of the Florida panhandle existed as
a series of sandy islands disconnected from the rest of what is now
North America; the rest of Florida was submerged. Because of its
isolation, unique vegetation evolved and was preserved, making what is
now called “the Florida scrublands” home to an exclusive and biodiverse
population; some species, such as the famous Florida scrub jay, survive
nowhere else on Earth.
Additionally, dozens of lakes speckle the
landscape in and around Lake Placid, making the region an ideal
location to examine water-quality issues. But, as tourism and industry
inundate the entire peninsula, Lake Placid’s ecosystem is becoming
increasingly threatened by development; the population of the greater
Lake Placid area is 26,000 and growing. The area is therefore an ideal
spot to study how land-use may be planned with respect to preserving
the natural environment.
Near Lake Placid, the seminar participants lodged and studied at the
Archbold Biological Research Station, a nature preserve perfectly
suited to saturating us with all the ecology we could absorb before we
turned our attention to community planning. University of Florida
Professors Michael Binford and Mark Brenner joined Forman.
Together,
this trio of experts introduced us to a side of Florida that we don’t
see in commercials. “It’s an intensive course, on the field trip,”
explained Forman. “That is, we work usually until about 11 o’clock at
night.” The days started before the morning rays graced the Sunshine
State, and the daily itinerary was packed with eco-adventures.
One of the first stops was the fire tower high above the
reservation. Looking down on the forest canopy, a few students felt
their stomachs swim as the tower swayed slightly in the wind. But the
view from the top was worth the climb; we could survey for miles around
and spot the lakes and forests, orange groves, cattle fields, highways,
and developments that we would explore more thoroughly in the following
72 hours. And, our challenge was set out before us: We would have to
consider all these various land-uses — these competing land-uses — for
our own planning projects that we would commence in just a few days.
From the heights of the tower, we dove down into the thick of the
wilderness. The first three days of this trip were dedicated to getting
down and dirty in this ecological haven. We crawled along hot sand,
tracking armadillos, bobcats, coyotes, and deer in order to understand
how animals move through the landscape. We waded through muddy waters
picking out interesting and odd specimens from water spiders to the
mysterious “jelly.” We inadvertently covered ourselves with soot in a
recently burned palmetto grove in order to understand how essential
periodic fires are to the ecosystem. We dug soil pits in order to see a
soil profile and to confirm that, yes, even during this time of
drought, there is still a water table!
And I believe it safe to say that this is the only course that included
a midnight chorus of Harvard students and instructors that could be
heard for miles around howling for wolves. Through all of these
interactive and immersive experiences, we came to understand what
factors help and harm biodiversity in both land and lake.
“It is a very nontraditional … way of learning; it allows students to
actually see and apply what they learn,” said Rachel Mak ’10, one of
the students in this year’s seminar.
But, as Forman explained, “This isn’t a general ecology course where we
talk ecology only. We are extracting things that are particularly
useful.”
After our ecology crash course, we surveyed how a host of different
human land-uses affect the natural system. We visited the wide-open
lands of cattle ranches, where excess nutrients swamp the riparian
system. We visited the strictly regimented citrus groves where, as one
local claimed, “you’d be shot if you touched an orange.” We compared
this with the wildly organic orange groves on a Seminole Indian
reservation, where we tasted freshly plucked fruit and succulent
sugarcane. Beyond agriculture, we examined housing, trailer park, town,
and highway strip developments.
The culmination of the trip was the 48-hour planning session, during
which students were challenged to design their own plans for the town
and surrounding areas. The assignment was to make plans for the future
of Lake Placid that would consider three environmental objectives (for
example, improving water quality or protecting endangered species) and
three human objectives (for example, improving transportation or
fostering a sense of community). Students could gather whatever
information they’d like about the town of Lake Placid and surrounding
lands. “They are creating their destiny … they’re determining the
information they need for their plans, and we just facilitate that,”
explained Forman.
The instructor and his teaching fellow served as “taxi driver” to help
us collect any information we wanted. Some students interviewed the
director of the chamber of commerce, some contacted citrus and flower
growers, some surveyed the downtown, some surveyed lakes and
shorelines. In the end, each plan reflected exclusive information that
the students gathered on their own initiative.
Forman observed, “When [the students] do their presentations, they’re
really proud of what they’ve done. They’ve worked hard and it is
absolutely unique. And so while the area that they’re using — the
spatial area — is the same for every team, the solutions are really
different.” Several of us designed new parks, nature reserves, and
biking paths. One group set forth a plan to revitalize the downtown in
order to foster a better sense of community. Another group aimed to
enhance fellowship through planting community gardens. My group planned
for the planting of an organic orange grove where tourists and
townspeople alike can actually pick oranges (without being shot) and no
longer feel alienated by the industry that defines their home state.
This work is not simply an exercise. After the intense two-day planning
period, a real-world jury is assembled. In past years, this has
included real estate developers, the county planner, the press, and any
other interested members of the community. It is they who judge the
plans, and it is they who keep the plans. Forman explained, “The
conceptual planning projects presented by the student teams simply
burst with creative ideas. … Often [the county head planner] mentions
how these ideas penetrate his plans, and the multitude of maps he’s
provided elegantly show this.” Since this seminar started visiting Lake
Placid, new bikeways, parks, nature corridors, and other ecologically
sound land-uses have begun to permeate the county’s plans.
By working together and integrating our unique perspectives, we
students learned how to apply classroom theories. But, as Forman was
quick to remind us, this is only the midpoint of the course. On our
return to Cambridge, our eyes have been newly opened, and our education
in “Ecology and Land-Use Planning” has just begun. “The building blocks
are now in place for the next, more challenging, phase,” said Forman.
“Now we face regional issues across a dozen towns in suburban Sudbury
Valley near Boston. … The next 2 billion people on Earth will be urban.
We better plan land use ecologically for that!”