<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://harvardscience.harvard.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>all David Cohen stories</title>
 <link>http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/stories/person/1739</link>
 <description>Stories and external links referencing a person (RSS)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Drug-coated stents don&#039;t save money but are reasonably cost-effective, study shows</title>
 <link>http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/medicine-health/articles/drug-coated-stents-dont-save-money-are-reasonably-cost-effective-study-show</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Treatment with the Cypher sirolimus-coated stent, developed by  Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson&#039;s Cordis division, cost approximately $2,900  more per patient compared to the use of bare metal stents. The  drug is designed to prevent restinosis, where a blood vessel  cleared of an obstruction begins to close back up again. Even  after factoring in other costs associated after one year, the  drug-coated stent was still almost $300 more expensive to use.
&lt;p&gt;But the authors suggest that when the quality of life benefits of  avoiding repeat procedures and recurrent symptoms are  factored in, the cost-effectiveness ratio for sirolimus-eluting  stents was approximately $27,000 per quality-adjusted year of  life gained - a value comparable to many other widely accepted  medical treatments.
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although our analysis suggested that (drug-coated) stents do  not fully pay for themselves in the long-run, it is possible (they)  will achieve true costs savings in the near future,&quot; writes David J.  Cohen, M.D., a cardiologist at BIDMC and the study&#039;s senior  author.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:10:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3864 at http://harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
