<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://harvardscience.harvard.edu" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>all meteorology stories</title>
 <link>http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/topic/4174</link>
 <description>Stories within a topic (RSS)</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Weather watchers forecast better forecasts</title>
 <link>http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/weather-watchers-forecast-better-forecasts</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brian Farrell, the Robert P. Burden Professor of Meteorology, is spearheading a project that is part of a five-year initiative funded by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research to spark progress in the general area of predictability of the atmosphere and oceans. &quot;Right now we have a fairly good forecast out to 48 hours,&quot; Farrell says, &quot;maybe two or three days. After that, you never know.&quot; The reason for this, he adds, is that starting out with a certain amount of error is inevitable. Both the observational data and the mathematical model used to parse it are imperfect; the necessity of using them together only compounds the problem.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/environments/articles/weather-watchers-forecast-better-forecasts&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:23:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>70652986</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3225 at http://harvardscience.harvard.edu</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
